Retour
article Retour
page d'accueil
Tableau
n� 1. Donn�es socio-d�mographiques
|
Groupe 1
Maghr�bins de France
(N=30)
|
Groupe
2
Fran�ais
autochtones
(N=30)
|
Groupe 3
Maghr�bins au Maghreb
(N=30)
|
Hommes
|
26
(87%)
|
19
(63%)
|
22
(73%)
|
Femmes
|
4
(13%)
|
11
(37%)
|
8
(27%)
|
Age moyen
|
25.7
|
28.7
|
28.5
|
Statut marital
|
|
|
|
C�libataire
|
30
(100%)
|
25
(83%)
|
23
(76%)
|
Mari�
|
0
|
3
(10%)
|
2
(7%)
|
Divorc�
|
0
|
2
(7%)
|
5
(17%)
|
Niveau
socio-�ducatif
|
|
|
|
Analphab�te
|
0
|
0
|
8
(27 %)
|
Primaire
|
14
(47%)
|
9
(30 %)
|
14
(47 %)
|
Moyen
|
12
(40 %)
|
14
(47 %)
|
5
(16 %)
|
Secondaire
|
3
(10%)
|
4
(13%)
|
3
(10%)
|
Sup�rieur
|
1
(3%)
|
3
(10 %)
|
0
|
Activit� Professionnelle
|
|
|
|
Actif
|
1
(3%)
|
8
(27%)
|
3
(10%)
|
Etudiant
|
1
(3%)
|
2
(7%)
|
0
|
Ch�mage
|
7
(24%)
|
4
(13%)
|
0
|
Sans emploi
|
13
(43%)
|
1
(3%)
|
27
(90%)
|
Pension
handicap�
|
8
(27%)
|
15
(50%)
|
0
|
Retour R�sultats

Tableau
N� 2. Diagnostics de Troubles schizophr�niques
|
Groupe 1
|
Groupe 2
|
Groupe 3
|
Significativit�
Statistique
|
Type clinique
|
|
|
|
|
Catatonique
|
0
|
1
(3%)
|
0
|
|
D�sorganis�
|
3
((10%)
|
2
(7%)
|
8
(27%)
|
X2
= 9.6
|
Parano�de
|
17
(56%)
|
18
(60%)
|
11
(37%)
|
p
= . 29
|
Indiff�renci�
|
8
(27%)
|
7
(23%)
|
10
(33%)
|
|
R�siduel
|
2
(7%)
|
2
(7%)
|
1
(3%)
|
|
Type �volutif
|
|
|
|
|
Subchronique
|
2
(7%)
|
1
(3%)
|
2
(7%)
|
|
Chronique
|
13
(43%)
|
10(33%)
|
15
(50%)
|
X2
= 8.4
|
Subchronique
avec exacerba�tion a�gue
|
8
(27%)
|
4
(14%)
|
3
(33%)
|
p
= .39
|
Chronique avec
exacerbation a�gue
|
6
(20%)
|
14
(47%)
|
10
(10%)
|
|
R�mission
|
1
(3%)
|
1
(3%)
|
0
|
|
Retour
R�sultats

Tableau
N� 3. Scores aux �chelles SANS et SAPS
|
Groupe 1
score
moyen
|
Groupe 2
score
moyen
|
Groupe 3
score
moyen
|
Test de Kruskall-Wallis
|
|
Composants � la SANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retrait ou pauvret� affective
|
11.2�4.7
|
10.7�4.5
|
9.4�5.2
|
H=2.5,
p=0.28
|
NS
|
Alogie
|
5.8�2.7
|
4.1�2.9
|
4.5�3.2
|
H=5.1,
p=0.07
|
NS
|
Avolition-Apathie
|
7.6�2.5
|
7�2.6
|
8.4�3.2
|
H=3.9,
p=0.14
|
NS
|
Anh�donie-Retrait social
|
11.2�3.1
|
10.9�3.2
|
11.8�4.1
|
H=1.1,
p=0.56
|
NS
|
Attention
|
3.5�2.1
|
3�2.1
|
3.2�2.4
|
H=0.6,
p=0.75
|
NS
|
Somme des sous-scores
|
39.2�10.2
|
35.7�11.2
|
37.4�14.6
|
H=1,
p=0.60
|
NS
|
Somme �valuations globales
|
11.9�2.9
|
11�3.2
|
12�4.3
|
H=1,
p=0.60
|
NS
|
Score total
|
51.1�12.9
|
46.7�14.1
|
49.4�18.7
|
H=1.1,
p=0.56
|
NS
|
Composants � la SAPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hallucinations
|
9.3�4.1
|
7.6�4.8
|
7.7�6.2
|
H=3.4,
p= 0.18
|
NS
|
|
Id�es d�lirantes
|
14�7.6
|
19.5�9
|
11.4�7.9
|
H=1.9,
p=0.39
|
NS
|
|
Comportement bizarre
|
3.5�2.8
|
3.1�2.7
|
4.9�3.5
|
H=4.5,
p=0.10
|
NS
|
|
Troubles
pens�e formelle
|
6.8�4.6
|
7.3�5.8
|
7.4�6
|
H=2.2,
p=0.99
|
NS
|
|
Somme des sous-scores
|
33.6�14.9
|
31�17.2
|
31.4�15.8
|
H=0.7,
p=0.70
|
NS
|
|
Somme �valuations globales
|
9.6�2.2
|
8.2�3.5
|
9.2�3.2
|
H=2.4,
p=0.30
|
NS
|
|
Score total
|
43.2�16.6
|
39.3�20.2
|
40.6�18.7
|
H=0.9,
p=0.63
|
NS
|
|
Retour R�sultats

Tableau N� 4. Scores � l'�chelle BPRS
|
Groupe 1
score
moyen
|
Groupe 2
score
moyen
|
Groupe 3
score
moyen
|
Test Kruskall-Wallis
|
|
Scores � la BPRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
N�gatif
|
14.9�2.5
|
14.6�3.4
|
13.9�4.4
|
H=1.8,
p=0.40
|
NS
|
Positif
|
20.3�5.3
|
21.6�7.4
|
20.2�5.4
|
H=0.6,
p=0.73
|
NS
|
Anxi�t�-D�pression
|
9.6�3.6
|
9.4�3.5
|
7.8�3.6
|
H=4.9,
p=0.08
|
NS
|
Anergie
|
11.7�2.1
|
11.9�3.1
|
10.8�3.3
|
H=2.8,
p=0.25
|
NS
|
Troubles de
pens�e
|
11.7�3.5
|
12.1�4.5
|
11.7�4.1
|
H=0.1,
p=0.95
|
NS
|
Activation
|
6.3�1.6
|
6.8�2.3
|
6.2�2
|
H=1.2,
p=0.54
|
NS
|
Hostilit�-Suspicion
|
8.4�2.6
|
7.9�3.5
|
7.7�3
|
H=1.3,
p=0.52
|
NS
|
Score total
|
47.6�7.8
|
48.1�8.4
|
44.2�5.9
|
H=6.5,
p=0.03
|
S
|
Retour R�sultats
La
bibliographie peut �tre obtenue en �crivant � : [email protected]
Retour
article 
|